Health differentials between citizens and immigrants in Europe: A heterogeneous convergence.

The literature on immigration and health has provided mixed evidence on the health differentials between immigrants and citizens, while a growing body of evidence alludes to the unhealthy assimilation of immigrants. Relying on five different health measures, the present paper investigates the heterogeneity in health patterns between immigrants and citizens, and also between immigrants depending on their country of origin. We use panel data on more than 100,000 older adults living in nineteen European countries. Our panel data methodology allows for unobserved heterogeneity. We document the existence of a healthy immigrant effect, of an unhealthy convergence, and of a reversal of the health differentials between citizens and immigrants over time. We are able to estimate the time threshold after which immigrants' health becomes worse than that of citizens. We further document some heterogeneity in the convergence of health differentials between immigrants and citizens in Europe. Namely, the unhealthy convergence is more pronounced in terms of chronic conditions for immigrants from low-HDI countries, and in terms of self-assessed health and body-mass index for immigrants from medium- and high-HDI countries.

Diferenciales de salud y una aproximación mediante el empleo del coeficiente de Gini y el índice de concentración en las provincias cubanas, 2002-2008 / Health's differentials and a approaching to use of Gini's coefficient and the rate of concentration in the Cuban provinces, 2002-2008

INTRODUCCIÓN: No existen muchas publicaciones científicas que aborden los diferenciales de salud entre las provincias de Cuba, ni que documenten los principales factores que impactaron en los resultados de salud de la población durante el período 1989 - 2000. En el año 2002 Fidel Castro destacó la existencia de una serie de errores de conducción y organización durante ese periodo, que a su criterio debilitaron el sistema de salud cubano y propiciaron la aparición de "determinadas desigualdades". OBJETIVO: Describir los principales diferenciales de salud existentes entre los distintos territorios de Cuba (factores determinantes de la salud de los cubanos) durante el período estudiado (2002-2008). MÉTODOS: Se utilizó como unidad geográfica a la provincia. Las catorce provincias cubanas fueron estratificadas sobre la base de tres ejes fundamentales: demográfico, económico y condiciones de vida, con vista a identificar posibles diferenciales de salud (inequidades en salud y en servicios de salud) mediante el empleo de la técnica del coeficiente de Gini y del índice de concentración. RESULTADOS: Se muestran los principales factores o variables con diferenciales de salud presentes en el país por provincias durante el período estudiado, se identificaron los factores o variables que mayores diferenciales exhibieron por cada uno de los ejes demográfico (densidad poblacional), económico (producción mercantil) y condiciones de vida (cobertura sanitaria). Se definen las diferencias existentes entre cada una de las provincias y por regiones y las características muy particulares de la capital cubana como provincia. CONCLUSIONES: Se confirma la hipótesis de que a pesar de la férrea voluntad política del estado de evitar inequidades en salud, aún se observan diferenciales no importantes en el comportamiento de las variables estudiadas por cada uno de los ejes de análisis entre provincias. No obstante, existen diferencias entre el comportamiento de esos diferenciales de acuerdo con los ejes de análisis, aspectos que deben ser y fueron considerados durante el proceso de diseño de políticas sanitarias, de reorganización de los servicios de salud, de formación de capital humano y de abordaje intersectorial de los determinantes no médicos de la salud durante los años más duros del período especial, lo que viene a confirmar el modelo teórico desarrollado previamente por los autores.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of scientific publications approaching the health differentials among the Cuban provinces and of to document the leading factors with impact on the health results in the population during the period 1989-2000. In 2002 Fidel Castro Rus emphasized on the existence of errors in the management and organization during above mentioned period, that according to his criterion to weaken the Cuban health system and led to appearance of "determined inequalities". OBJECTIVE: To describe the leading health differentials present among the different Cuban territories (determinant health factors for Cubans) during the study period (2002-2008). METHODS: The province was used as geographical unit. The fourteen Cuban provinces were stratified on the base of the three fundamental bases: demographic, economic and life conditions to identify the potential health differentials (inequalities in health and in its services) using the Gini's coefficient technique and the concentration's index. RESULTS: The leading factors or variables with health differentials present in our country by provinces during the study period are showed, identifying the factors or variables with greater differentials by each of the demographic bases (population density), economic (commercial production) and life conditions (health coverage). The differences present among each of the provinces and regions are defined as well as the very particular characteristics of the Cuban capital as province. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that despite the strong political and state will to avoid health inequalities, still there are no-significant differences in the behavior of study variables by each of the bases of analysis among provinces. Nevertheless, there differences among the behavior of such differentials according to analysis's bases, features that be and were considered during the process of health politics design, of reorganization of health services, of human resource training and the intersectorial approach of non-health physicians determinants during the more hard year of special period, confirming the theoretical model previously developed by the authors.

Diferenciales de salud y una aproximación mediante el empleo del coeficiente de Gini y el índice de concentración en las provincias cubanas, 2002-2008 / Health's differentials and a approaching to use of Gini's coefficient and the rate of concentration in the Cuban provinces, 2002-2008

INTRODUCCIÓN: No existen muchas publicaciones científicas que aborden los diferenciales de salud entre las provincias de Cuba, ni que documenten los principales factores que impactaron en los resultados de salud de la población durante el período 1989-2000. En el año 2002 Fidel Castro destacó la existencia de una serie de errores de conducción y organización durante ese periodo, que a su criterio debilitaron el sistema de salud cubano y propiciaron la aparición de determinadas desigualdades. OBJETIVO: Describir los principales diferenciales de salud existentes entre los distintos territorios de Cuba (factores determinantes de la salud de los cubanos) durante el período estudiado (2002-2008). MÉTODOS: Se utilizó como unidad geográfica a la provincia. Las catorce provincias cubanas fueron estratificadas sobre la base de tres ejes fundamentales: demográfico, económico y condiciones de vida, con vista a identificar posibles diferenciales de salud (inequidades en salud y en servicios de salud) mediante el empleo de la técnica del coeficiente de Gini y del índice de concentración. RESULTADOS: Se muestran los principales factores o variables con diferenciales de salud presentes en el país por provincias durante el período estudiado, se identificaron los factores o variables que mayores diferenciales exhibieron por cada uno de los ejes demográfico (densidad poblacional), económico (producción mercantil) y condiciones de vida (cobertura sanitaria). Se definen las diferencias existentes entre cada una de las provincias y por regiones y las características muy particulares de la capital cubana como provincia. CONCLUSIONES: Se confirma la hipótesis de que a pesar de la férrea voluntad política del estado de evitar inequidades en salud, aún se observan diferenciales no importantes en el comportamiento de las variables estudiadas por cada uno de los ejes de análisis entre provincias. No obstante, existen diferencias entre el comportamiento de esos ...(AU)

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of scientific publications approaching the health differentials among the Cuban provinces and of to document the leading factors with impact on the health results in the population during the period 1989-2000. In 2002 Fidel Castro Rus emphasized on the existence of errors in the management and organization during above mentioned period, that according to his criterion to weaken the Cuban health system and led to appearance of determined inequalities. OBJECTIVE: To describe the leading health differentials present among the different Cuban territories (determinant health factors for Cubans) during the study period (2002-2008). METHODS: The province was used as geographical unit. The fourteen Cuban provinces were stratified on the base of the three fundamental bases: demographic, economic and life conditions to identify the potential health differentials (inequalities in health and in its services) using the Gini's coefficient technique and the concentration's index. RESULTS: The leading factors or variables with health differentials present in our country by provinces during the study period are showed, identifying the factors or variables with greater differentials by each of the demographic bases (population density), economic (commercial production) and life conditions (health coverage). The differences present among each of the provinces and regions are defined as well as the very particular characteristics of the Cuban capital as province. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that despite the strong political and state will to avoid health inequalities, still there are no-significant differences in the behavior of study variables by each of the bases of analysis among provinces. Nevertheless, there differences among the behavior of such differentials according to analysis's bases, features that be and were considered during the process of health politics design, of reorganization of health services, of human ...(AU)

Public and private health care utilization differences between socioeconomic strata in Jamaica.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the use of private and public health care services among Jamaicans over a 15-year period (1991-2007). DESIGN AND METHODS: Statistics on the use of health care services were taken from the Jamaica Survey of Living Conditions (JSLC) for the 15-year period 1993 to 2007. Use of hospital services were represented in income quintiles and compared for private and public facilities. The difference in percentage use between public and private was compared by quintiles over the period and the variability in those differentials assessed. RESULTS: This study highlights the increasing use of private services by increasing wealth, exaggerated for the wealthiest quintile. There is a widening of the differences in utilization between public and private centers as income level increases (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Internal and external economic conditions influence the use of private and public health care services in Jamaica. Although the relative increase in the cost (to the user) of public health care is more than that for private health care, the actual cost to use the public health care system is still significantly cheaper than using the private system. Lower income health care users tend to take the lesser cost option.